Herpetological Osteopathology

  • Rothschild B
  • Schultze H
  • Pellegrini R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As scientific analysis of testable hypotheses has replaced the speculative approach to study of bone disease in recent and fossil amphibians and reptiles, the field has advanced from simply reporting observations to analyzing their implications. This process is predicated upon a reproducible data base which explains/diagnoses the nature of bony alterations and a secure review of the literature. Thereby hangs the rub. The herpetological literature are difficult to access (let alone read) and are scattered through many prominent and eclectic journals and in the lay literature. While older diagnoses often have not stood the test of time, the clarity of report descriptions usually allows confident identification of the underlying pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rothschild, B. M., Schultze, H.-P., & Pellegrini, R. (2012). Herpetological Osteopathology. Herpetological Osteopathology. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0824-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free