Numerical Comparisons Between URANS and Hybrid RANS/LES at a High Reynolds Number Flow Using Unstructured Meshes

  • You J
  • Kwon O
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the present study, the turbulent flow fields around a circular cylinder at Re=3.6ⅹ10 6 were investigated based on an unstructured mesh technique, and the comparisons between URANS(S-A, SST) and hybrid RANS/LES(DES, SAS) methods for the simulation of high Reynolds number flow have been conducted. For this purpose, unsteady characteristics of vortex shedding and time-averaged quantities were compared. A quasi-steady solution-adaptive mesh refinement was also made for the URANS and hybrid RANS/LES approaches. The results showed that the simple changes in the turbulent length scale or source term of turbulent models made the flow fields less dissipative and more realistic in hybrid RANS/LES methods than the URANS approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

You, J.-Y., & Kwon, O.-J. (2010). Numerical Comparisons Between URANS and Hybrid RANS/LES at a High Reynolds Number Flow Using Unstructured Meshes. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 11(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.5139/ijass.2010.11.1.041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free