Pelvic floor muscle training versus other active treatments for urinary incontinence in women

5Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To determine the effects of pelvic floor muscle training against other single treatment modalities in the management of female urinary (stress, mixed, urgency) incontinence. We will make the following comparisons: PFMT versus lifestyle intervention, based on structured and supervised programme; PFMT versus weighted vaginal cones; PFMT versus mechanical intervention (e.g. pessary); PFMT versus behavioural and psychological therapy (e.g. bladder training with the characteristic scheduled voiding regimen); PFMT versus non-invasive electrical or magnetic stimulation (we will exclude trials that involve the use of implantable electrodes); PFMT versus drug therapy; PFMT versus surgery; PFMT versus any other stand-alone active treatment as reported by individual trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lins, S., Hayder-Beichel, D., Kunath, F., Cartwright, R., Motschall, E., Antes, G., & Rücker, G. (2014). Pelvic floor muscle training versus other active treatments for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007173.pub3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free