Comparative safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to influenza vaccines: A pharmacovigilance analysis using WHO international database

43Citations
Citations of this article
138Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are being rolled out. Despite the high volume of emerging evidence regarding adverse events (AEs) associated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, previous studies have thus far been largely based on the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated control, possibly highlighting the AE risks with COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Comparing the safety profile of mRNA vaccinated individuals with otherwise vaccinated individuals would enable a more relevant assessment for the safety of mRNA vaccination. We designed a comparative safety study between 18 755 and 27 895 individuals who reported to VigiBase for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with mRNA COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, respectively, from January 1, 2020, to January 17, 2021. We employed disproportionality analysis to rapidly detect relevant safety signals and compared comparative risks of a diverse span of AEFIs for the vaccines. The safety profile of novel mRNA vaccines was divergent from that of influenza vaccines. The overall pattern suggested that systematic reactions like chill, myalgia, fatigue were more noticeable with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, while injection site reactogenicity events were more prevalent with the influenza vaccine. Compared to the influenza vaccine, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines demonstrated a significantly higher risk for a few manageable cardiovascular complications, such as hypertensive crisis (adjusted reporting odds ratio [ROR], 12.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47–65.54), and supraventricular tachycardia (adjusted ROR, 7.94; 95% CI, 2.62–24.00), but lower risk of neurological complications such as syncope, neuralgia, loss of consciousness, Guillain-Barre syndrome, gait disturbance, visual impairment, and dyskinesia. This study has not identified significant safety concerns regarding mRNA vaccination in real-world settings. The overall safety profile patterned a lower risk of serious AEFI following mRNA vaccines compared to influenza vaccines.

References Powered by Scopus

Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine

10859Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

7599Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based covid-19 vaccine candidates

1929Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impaired CD4<sup>+</sup> T cell response in older adults is associated with reduced immunogenicity and reactogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Delivering the next generation of cancer immunotherapies with RNA

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of vaccines in the COVID-19 pandemic: what have we learned?

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, M. S., Jung, S. Y., Ahn, J. G., Park, S. J., Shoenfeld, Y., Kronbichler, A., … Smith, L. (2022). Comparative safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to influenza vaccines: A pharmacovigilance analysis using WHO international database. Journal of Medical Virology, 94(3), 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27424

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

63%

Researcher 12

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

43%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

27%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 8

18%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 5

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free