Approaching or Decentering? Differential Neural Networks Underlying Experiential Emotion Regulation and Cognitive Defusion

5Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The current study investigated the bottom-up experiential emotion regulation in comparison to the cognitiveve top down-approach of cognitive defusion. Rooted in an experiential- and client-centered psychotherapeutic approach, experiential emotion regulation involves an active, non-intervening, accepting, open and welcoming approach towards the bodily felt affective experience in a welcoming, compassionate way, expressed in ‘experiential awareness’ in a first phase, and its verbalization or ‘experiential expression’ in a second phase. Defusion refers to the ability to observe one’s thoughts and feelings in a detached manner. Nineteen healthy participants completed an emotion regulation task during fMRI scanning by processing highly arousing negative events by images. Both experiential emotion regulation and cognitive defusion resulted in higher negative emotion compared to a ‘watch’ control condition. On the neurophysiological level, experiential emotion regulation recruited brain areas that regulate attention towards affective- and somatosensorial experience such as the anterior cingulate cortex, the paracingulate gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, and the prefrontal pole, areas underlying multisensory information integration (e.g., angular gyrus), and linking body states to emotion recognition and awareness (e.g., postcentral gyrus). Experiential emotion regulation, relative to the control condition, also resulted in a higher interaction between the anterior insular cortex and left amygdala while participants experienced less negative emotion. Cognitive defusion decreased activation in the subcortical areas such as the brainstem, the thalamus, the amygdala, and the hippocampus. In contrast to cognitive defusion, experiential emotion regulation relative to demonstrated greater activation in the left angular gyrus, indicating more multisensory information integration. These findings provide insight into different and specific neural networks underlying psychotherapy-based experiential emotion regulation and cognitive defusion.

References Powered by Scopus

Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales

30264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotion circuits in the brain

6671Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review

6170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neural mechanisms of acceptance-commitment therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A resting-state and task-based fMRI study

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Examining Links Between Distinct Affective States and Tobacco Lapse During a Cessation Attempt Among African Americans: A Cohort Study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implementation of Mindfulness-Based Emotion Regulation Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., Vantieghem, I., Dong, D., Nemegeer, J., De Mey, J., Van Schuerbeek, P., … Vandekerckhove, M. (2022). Approaching or Decentering? Differential Neural Networks Underlying Experiential Emotion Regulation and Cognitive Defusion. Brain Sciences, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091215

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

60%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

20%

Neuroscience 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free