A Comparison of Machine Learning and Empirical Approaches for Deriving Bathymetry from Multispectral Imagery

39Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Knowledge of the precise water depth in shallow areas of the ocean is of great significance to the safe navigation of ships and hydrographic surveying. Compared with traditional bathymetry, satellite remote sensing for water depth determination makes it possible to cover large areas by dynamic observation. In this paper, we conducted an optically shallow water bathymetric inversion study using a Stumpf empirical model, random forest model, neural network model, and support vector machine model based on Sentinel-2 satellite images and Ganquan Dao measured bathymetry data. We compared and analyzed the inversion results based on the empirical model and different machine learning models. The results show that the Stumpf empirical and machine learning models are capable of inverting optically shallow water depth. Moreover, the machine learning models had better fitting ability than the Stumpf empirical model with a sufficient number of samples, especially when the water depth was greater than 15 m. In addition, the random forest model had the highest overall accuracy among these models, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.41 m and a regression coefficient (R2) of 0.96 for the test data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, W., Tang, Y., Jing, W., Li, Y., Yang, J., Deng, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A Comparison of Machine Learning and Empirical Approaches for Deriving Bathymetry from Multispectral Imagery. Remote Sensing, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free