Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction, perspective 1

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The main goal of surgical correction of hallux valgus is the morphologic and functional rebalance of the first ray, correcting all other characteristics of the deformity [1]. Historically, distal metatarsal osteotomies have been indicated in cases of mild or moderate deformity with an intermetatarsal angle as large as 15°. Using certain osteotomies, it is possible to correct intermetatarsal angles as large as 20°. Distal osteotomies may also be used to correct deformities characterized by deviation of the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) or to address concomitant stiffness [2]. Since the first operation published by Reverdin [3] in 1881, many authors have reported their experiences using different operations, each of them characterized by different indications, approaches, designs, and fixations [4-12]. Several comparative studies have been reported comparing radiographic and clinical results among many different techniques, and a review of the literature reveals the satisfaction with all operations to be in the upper 80% level or higher [2, 13]. In 1983, New (personal communication) reported a percutaneous technique for hallux valgus correction. This technique was then reported by Bosh et al. [14], who performed a Hohmann-type [4] osteotomy fixed by only one K-wire, as described by Lamprecht and Kramer [15] in 1982, and, more recently, Magnan et al. [16] reported a description of his experience. These percutaneous operations reduce the surgical trauma because they are performed without large incisions and soft tissue procedures. They require, on the other hand, the use of particular instrumentation, such as Lindemann’s osteotrite, manipulators, or dislocators. Furthermore, with these percutaneous techniques, the correction is performed blindly, and the intraoperative use of fluoroscopy is needed. The minimally invasive bunion correction used by us is not a new technique [17, 18] because it uses an osteotomy and a stabilization method already reported by other authors, making the surgical technique usable in accordance with current concepts in hallux valgus surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giannini, S., Bevoni, R., Vannini, F., & Cadossi, M. (2016). Minimally invasive hallux valgus correction, perspective 1. In Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics (pp. 811–821). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_71

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free