Impact of implementing five-level triage system on patients outcomes and resource utilization in the emergency department of Alexandria main university hospital

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate impact of five-level triage system on Emergency Department (ED) patients’ outcome and resources’ utilization. Design: A comparative observational study (pre-/post-intervention). Setting: ED of Alexandria Main University Hospital. Patients: All trauma patients and adult emergencies presented to ED from 1st of September 2021 to 31st of May 2022. Patients who were discharged or left against medical advice were excluded. Methods: Five-level triage was implemented in 1st of December 2021 using Australasian Triage Scale. Primary outcome was ED mortality, while secondary outcomes were resources’ utilization and ED length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression model for predictors of ED mortality was used. Results: Totally, 9766 and 22,936 patients were subjected to three- and five-level triaging, respectively. ED mortality dropped from 5.26% to 1.46%. All resources including human factors were less utilized. ED LOS has declined from 170.1 ± 88.7 to 72.00 ± 109.8 min. All changes were statistically significant, p < 0.05. Significant predictors of ED mortality were three-level triaging, medical emergencies, initial code-1, time-to-clinical decision > 60 min, >5 differential diagnoses, more interventions, and longer ED LOS with different Odds ratios. Conclusion: Five-level triaging reduced rates of mis-triaging, ED mortality, resources’ utilization, and ED LOS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabry, A. A. F., Abdel Salam, W. N., Abdel Salam, M. M., Moustafa, K. S., Gaber, E. M., & Beshey, B. N. (2023). Impact of implementing five-level triage system on patients outcomes and resource utilization in the emergency department of Alexandria main university hospital. Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia, 39(1), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/11101849.2023.2234712

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free