RoboPrivacy and the Law as “Meta-Technology”

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper examines how a particular class of robotic applications, i.e. service robots, or consumer robots, may affect current legal frameworks of privacy and data protection. More particularly, the focus is on (i) a new expectation of privacy brought about by these robotic applications; (ii) the realignment of the traditional distinction between data processors and data controllers; and, (iii) a novel set of challenges to the principle of privacy by design. Instead of a one-way movement of social evolution from technology to law, however, a key component of the analysis concerns the aim of the law to govern technological innovation as well as human and artificial behaviour through the regulatory tools of technology. Since most domestic and service robots are not a sort of “out-of-the-box” machine and moreover, their behaviour and decisions can be unpredictable and risky, special attention is drawn to the experiment of the Japanese government that has worked out a way to address (some of) the legal issues, which are at stake in this paper, through the creation of special zones for robotics empirical testing and development, namely a form of living lab, or Tokku. Interestingly, some EU member states have already followed suit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pagallo, U. (2018). RoboPrivacy and the Law as “Meta-Technology.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10791, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free