Target-mask similarity in backward recognition masking of perceived tone duration

11Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous research using a backward recognition masking paradigm revealed that the perceived duration of a target increased with actual target duration, the time available for processing the target, and the duration of the mask. A model was developed which submits that the percept of target duration increases during the presentation of the target and the following silent interval. The mask terminates the growth of the perceived duration of the target. In addition, the perceived duration of the mask adds something to the final duration judgment. The model has provided a good description of duration perception for both tones and vowels, by several converging measures. Yet, in the previous studies, the target and mask were identical in all respects except for duration. The influence of the masking tone may possibly have been limited to this idiosyncratic situation. The present study explored this possibility by manipulating the frequency similarity between the target and masking tones. The target and masking tones could now differ in both duration and frequency. The earlier results were replicated, demonstrating that an identity of the target and masking tones is not a necessary condition for the previous findings. © 1978 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

160Citations
82Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The perception of time

428Citations
258Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Massaro, D. W., & Idson, W. L. (1978). Target-mask similarity in backward recognition masking of perceived tone duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 24(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206093

Readers over time

‘12‘15‘17‘18‘20‘2200.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Psychology 2

33%

Linguistics 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0