Do Strategic Alliances, Acquisitions, and R&D Investments Act as Complements or Substitutes?

1Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper studies possible complementarities and substitution effects between such strategic choices as alliances, acquisitions and internal R&D investments. The findings indicate that a firm's absorptive capacity affects the presence of complementarities and substitution effects among those strategic choices. Firms with high absorptive capacity exhibit substitution effects between alliances and acquisitions and between alliances and internal R&D investments. Firms with high absorptive capacity also exhibit complementarities between acquisitions and additional R&D investments. These results were obtained from panel data of large and medium U.S. companies spanning the years 1998-2009. The results are robust to the use of different measures of performance: profitability, market-tobook value, and sales growth. This paper contributes to our understanding of the role of absorptive capacity for the optimal choice of inter-organizational strategy vs. greater internal R&D investments.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martynov, A. (2016). Do Strategic Alliances, Acquisitions, and R&D Investments Act as Complements or Substitutes? Foundations of Management, 8(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2016-0001

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

80%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 8

67%

Social Sciences 2

17%

Philosophy 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0