Aim: This study aimed to characterize the periodontal breakdown during supportive periodontal care (SPC) and to quantify the corresponding cost-effectiveness of periodontal therapy. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from charts of patients who received active periodontal therapy (APT) with a minimum follow-up of ≥10 years. Analysis was done to identify factors associated with the incidence of additional sub-gingival instrumentation (SGI) and/or surgery (SUR) during SPC and mean cumulative cost of recurrence was calculated. All relevant data were collected. Results: In all, 442 patients were included. Over the follow-up period, 62% of Stage I and II patients and 72% of Stage III and IV patients required further treatment following the APT; 56.5% of SGI patients and 78.6% of SUR patients received a second intervention. SUR patients received more SUR during the follow-up period (p =.035). Stage III and IV patients received more SUR during SPC than Stage I and II patients (p =.001). Grade C patients received more SUR during the follow-up period (p
CITATION STYLE
Saleh, M. H. A., Decker, A., Ravidà, A., Wang, H. lay, & Tonetti, M. (2024). Periodontitis stage and grade modifies the benefit of regular supportive periodontal care in terms of need for retreatment and mean cumulative cost. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 51(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13909
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.