Value of multidisciplinary reassessment in attribution of neuropsychiatric events to systemic lupus erythematosus: Prospective data from the Leiden NPSLE cohort

48Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. To determine the contribution of reassessment in the attribution process of neuropsychiatric (NP) events to SLE or other aetiologies in a large, prospective and multidisciplinary assessed NPSLE cohort and to compare these results with other available attribution models for NP events occurring in SLE. Methods. Three hundred and four consecutive SLE patients presenting NP events were evaluated. All subjects underwent standardized multidisciplinary medical, neuropsychological, laboratory and radiological examination on the inclusion and reassessment dates. Diagnosis was always established by multidisciplinary consensus. The final diagnosis after reassessment also took into account disease course and response to treatment. These data were compared with currently available attribution models for NP events in SLE. Results. A total of 463NP events were established. After reassessment, attribution to SLE was discordant in 64 (13.8%) NP events when compared with the first visit. We show that 14.5% of NP events previously attributed to SLE reclassified as non-NPSLE. In 86.4% of these patients immunosuppressive therapy was started after the first visit. When reassessment and available attribution models were compared, NPSLE cases overlapped considerably. Although specificity was high for all comparisons (0.81-0.95), an important variation in sensitivity (0.39-0.83) and agreement estimates (k = 0.29-0.68) was observed. The Italian algorithm showed the highest sensitivity and specificity ( > 0.80) and moderate agreement (0.59-0.64). Conclusion. In clinical practice NP events presenting in SLE are too often attributed to an immunemediated origin. Multidisciplinary reassessment avoids misclassification in NPSLE. Multidisciplinary reassessment is the reference standard in NP events presenting in SLE and cannot be replaced by available attribution models.

References Powered by Scopus

The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus

12951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

12932Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

10071Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2019 Update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

1483Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions

268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The management of neuropsychiatric lupus in the 21st century: Still so many unmet needs?

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magro-Checa, C., Zirkzee, E. J., Beaart-van de Voorde, L. J. J., Middelkoop, H. A., van der Wee, N. J., Huisman, M. V., … Steup-Beekman, G. M. (2017). Value of multidisciplinary reassessment in attribution of neuropsychiatric events to systemic lupus erythematosus: Prospective data from the Leiden NPSLE cohort. Rheumatology (United Kingdom), 56(10), 1676–1683. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex019

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

59%

Researcher 9

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

79%

Neuroscience 3

10%

Psychology 2

7%

Chemistry 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free