Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods: One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. Results: Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0±1.7kg/m2 vs. 24.5±1.8kg/m2, P< 0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9±3.5cm vs. 4.1±3.3cm, P< 0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3±17.2mL vs. 219.6±30.9mL, P< 0.0001; 55.6±28.3 vs. 141.1±50.4mL, P< 0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P< 0.05). Conclusions: The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yuan, B., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Zhang, Y., Fu, Y., & An, W. (2018). Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free