A proliferation of pathogens through the 20th century

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A substantial proportion of immunologists, microbiologists and health professionals - and, indeed, many dictionaries - currently regard the term pathogen as a synonym for a pathogenic organism (most often a micro-organism). I will argue that this is a distortion of its original meaning -'a specific causative agent of disease'. An analysis of the historical use of the term pathogen together with a comparison of the meanings of pathogen, pathogenic and pathogenesis suggest that this was an insidious change. It began as a convenient abbreviation, escalated into a misappropriation and is now lodged in bio-medicine's popular lexicon. In science, we should resist the pressures brought about by the mass action of common usage - unless there is a good, logical reason to accept this change. I propose that this common usage results in a distortion and leads to conceptual confusion, particularly when we try to understand the interaction between hosts and invasive organisms. This drift, in which pathogen becomes exclusively a living organism, is corrupting. There is a strong case for correcting and reversing it. © 2008 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cunliffe, J. (2008, August). A proliferation of pathogens through the 20th century. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02130.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free