Kiloparsec-scale simulations of star formation in disk galaxies. I. the unmagnetized and zero-feedback limit

22Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present hydrodynamic simulations of the evolution of self-gravitating dense gas on scales of 1 kpc down to ≲ parsec in a galactic disk, designed to study dense clump formation from giant molecular clouds (GMCs). These structures are expected to be the precursors to star clusters and this process may be the rate limiting step controlling star formation rates in galactic systems as described by the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation. We follow the thermal evolution of the gas down to 5 K using extinction-dependent heating and cooling functions. We do not yet include magnetic fields or localized stellar feedback, so the evolution of the GMCs and clumps is determined solely by self-gravity balanced by thermal and turbulent pressure support and the large-scale galactic shear. While cloud structures and densities change significantly during the simulation, GMC virial parameters remain mostly above unity for timescales exceeding the free-fall time of GMCs indicating that energy from galactic shear and large-scale cloud motions continuously cascades down to and within the GMCs. We implement star formation at a slow, inefficient rate of 2% per local free-fall time, but even this yields global star formation rates that are about two orders of magnitude larger than the observed Kennicutt-Schmidt relation due to overproduction of dense gas clumps. We expect a combination of magnetic support and localized stellar feedback is required to inhibit dense clump formation to 1% of the rate that results from the nonmagnetic, zero-feedback limit. © 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Loo, S., Butler, M. J., & Tan, J. C. (2013). Kiloparsec-scale simulations of star formation in disk galaxies. I. the unmagnetized and zero-feedback limit. Astrophysical Journal, 764(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/36

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free