Treatment of imported malaria in adults: A multicentre study in France

11Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Data about anti-malarial drugs prescription practices in Europe and the safety of imported malaria treatments are scanty. In 1999, a French consensus development conference published guidelines for the prevention and treatment of imported P. falciparum malaria. The impact of these guidelines has not been evaluated. Aim: To investigate the impact of these guidelines on the prescription of anti-malarials, and to evaluate the incidence of acute drug events (ADEs) leading to discontinuation of treatment. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: Members of the medical staff i n 14 French infectious and tropical disease wards completed a standardized form for each patient treated for imported malaria in 2001. A propensity score matching technique was used to estimate the risk of ADEs leading to discontinuation of the regimen. Results: In the 474 patients studied, quinine was the first-line anti-malarial most often prescribed. Only 3% of patients received halofantrine. Mefloquine was associated with a RR of 4.9 (95%CI 3.2-7.4, p<0.00001) risk of discontinuation of treatment due to ADEs. Discussion: The very limited use of halofantrine indicates that the main practice recommendations of the guidelines have been taken into account. Mefloquine was associated with a substantial risk of discontinuing the treatment because of ADEs. This is a serious limitation for the use of mefloquine in the treatment of out-patients with imported malaria. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ranque, S., Marchou, B., Malvy, D., Adehossi, E., Laganier, R., Tissot-Dupont, H., … Massip, P. (2005). Treatment of imported malaria in adults: A multicentre study in France. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 98(10), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hci110

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free