Evidence of selection as a cause for racial disparities in fibroproliferative disease

18Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fibroproliferative diseases are common complex traits featuring scarring and overgrowth of connective tissue which vary widely in presentation because they affect many organ systems. Most fibroproliferative diseases are more prevalent in African-derived populations than in European populations, leading to pronounced health disparities. It is hypothesized that the increased prevalence of these diseases in African-derived populations is due to selection for pro-fibrotic alleles that are protective against helminth infections. We constructed a genetic risk score (GRS) of fibroproliferative disease risk-increasing alleles using 147 linkage disequilibrium-pruned variants identified through genome-wide association studies of seven fibroproliferative diseases with large African-European prevalence disparities. A comparison of the fibroproliferative disease GRS between 1000 Genomes Phase 3 populations detected a higher mean GRS in AFR (mean = 148 risk alleles) than EUR (mean = 136 risk alleles; T-test p-value = 1.75x10-123). To test whether differences in GRS burden are systematic and may be due to selection, we employed the quantitative trait loci (QTL) sign test. The QTL sign test result indicates that population differences in risk-increasing allele burdens at these fibroproliferative disease variants are systematic and support a model featuring selective pressure (p-value = 0.011). These observations were replicated in an independent sample and were more statistically significant (T-test p-value = 7.26x10-237, sign test p-value = 0.015). This evidence supports the role of selective pressure acting to increase frequency of fibroproliferative alleles in populations of African relative to European ancestry populations.

Figures

  • Table 1. Fibroproliferative diseases with increased prevalence in African-derived populations.
  • Table 2. Summary statistics for fibroproliferative GRS among AFR and EUR populations from 1000 Genomes, and among BioVU samples.
  • Fig 1. Distribution of fibroproliferative disease GRS in populations from 1000 Genomes. Results are sorted by median risk allele burden. Bars represent the 25th and 75th percentiles and are color coded by super-population (Green = EUR, Blue = AMR, Orange = SAS, Purple = EAS, Red = AFR).
  • Fig 2. Cumulative distribution of GRS in 1000 Genomes AFR, EUR, ASW, and BioVU populations. *AFR includes only the continental African populations.

References Powered by Scopus

A global reference for human genetic variation

11641Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies

7772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes

6118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Endomyocardial Biopsy Characterization of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Prevalence of Cardiac Amyloidosis

191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk Factors and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A trans-ethnic genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hellwege, J. N., Torstenson, E. S., Russell, S. B., Edwards, T. L., & Velez Edwards, D. R. (2017). Evidence of selection as a cause for racial disparities in fibroproliferative disease. PLoS ONE, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182791

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 4

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

53%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

11%

Engineering 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 54

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0