In this paper we discuss different architectures for reasoning under uncertainty related to our ongoing research into building a medical decision support system. The uncertainty in the medical domain can be divided into a well understood part and a less understood part. This motivates the use of a hybrid decision support system, and in particular, we argue that a Bayesian network should be used for those parts of the domain that are well understood and can be explicitly modeled, whereas a case-based reasoning system should be employed to reason in parts of the domain where no such model is available. Four architectures that combine Bayesian networks and case-based reasoning are proposed, and our working hypothesis is that these hybrid systems each will perform better than either framework will do on its own. © 2010 IFIP.
CITATION STYLE
Bruland, T., Aamodt, A., & Langseth, H. (2010). Architectures integrating case-based reasoning and Bayesian networks for clinical decision support. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 340 AICT, pp. 82–91). Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16327-2_13
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.