Body-composition assessment in infancy: Air-displacement plethysmography compared with a reference 4-compartment model

254Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A better understanding of the associations of early infant nutrition and growth with adult health requires accurate assessment of body composition in infancy. Objective: This study evaluated the performance of an infant-sized air-displacement plethysmograph (PEA POD Infant Body Composition System) for the measurement of body composition in infants. Design: Healthy infants (n = 49; age: 1.7-23.0 wk; weight: 2.7-7.1 kg) were examined with the PEA POD system. Reference values for percentage body fat (%BF) were obtained from a 4-compartment (4-C) body-composition model, which was based on measurements of total body water, bone mineral content, and total body potassium. Results: Mean (±SD) reproducibility of %BF values obtained with the PEA POD system was 0.4 ± 1.3%. Mean %BF obtained with the PEA POD system (16.9 ± 6.5%) did not differ significantly from that obtained with the 4-C model (16.3 ± 7.2%), and the regression between %BF for the 4-C model and that for the PEA POD system (R2= 0.73, SEE = 3.7%BF) did not deviate significantly from the line of identity (y = x). Conclusions: The PEA POD system provided a reliable, accurate, and immediate assessment of %BF in infants. Because of its ease of use, good precision, minimum safety concerns, and bedside accessibility, the PEA POD system is highly suitable for monitoring changes in body composition during infant growth in both the research and clinical settings. © 2007 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ellis, K. J., Yao, M., Shypailo, R. J., Urlando, A., Wong, W. W., & Heird, W. C. (2007). Body-composition assessment in infancy: Air-displacement plethysmography compared with a reference 4-compartment model. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/85.1.90

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free