Technological city and cultural criticism: challenges, limits, politics

5Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Technology has become a ‘life companion’ in our cities. Thanks to its fascinating power and the huge economic interest behind it, technology has recently reached an ‘epic’ role in our expectations for exiting the profound crisis we are in. The city represents the perfect place for such a marvel. Even if we really cannot get along without it, nevertheless technology has a ‘dark side’ that needs to be known. Methods: In this, paper we try to understand if and why we have to protect the place of the critical debate starting from our cities. Do the problems of our cities really have to do with the lack of technologies? Results: Critical thinking makes us understand that we need to enforce the tools that people can use to recognize the benefits and menaces of technologies, avoiding the illusion of embracing the idea of a city that is good just because it is ‘smart’. Innovation and equity are not two spontaneously cooperating issues. Conclusions: Urbanism and urban politics have new challenges ahead that are harder than we think. This paper presents five proposals to open a discussion suggesting some first steps.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effective use of smart cities in crisis cases: A systematic review of the literature

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural experiences in the framework of “cultural cities”: measuring the socioeconomic impact of culture in urban performance

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural Biases in the Smart City: Implications and Challenges

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pileri, P. (2015). Technological city and cultural criticism: challenges, limits, politics. City, Territory and Architecture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-015-0028-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

69%

Researcher 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

36%

Computer Science 3

21%

Engineering 3

21%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

21%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free