Educational attainment and cardiovascular disease in the united states: A quasi-experimental instrumental variables analysis

59Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background There is ongoing debate about whether education or socioeconomic status (SES) should be inputs into cardiovascular disease (CVD) prediction algorithms and clinical risk adjustment models. It is also unclear whether intervening on education will affect CVD, in part because there is controversy regarding whether education is a determinant of CVD or merely correlated due to confounding or reverse causation. We took advantage of a natural experiment to estimate the population-level effects of educational attainment on CVD and related risk factors. Methods and findings We took advantage of variation in United States state-level compulsory schooling laws (CSLs), a natural experiment that was associated with geographic and temporal differences in the minimum number of years that children were required to attend school. We linked census data on educational attainment (N = approximately 5.4 million) during childhood with outcomes in adulthood, using cohort data from the 1992–2012 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; N = 30,853) and serial cross-sectional data from 1971–2012 waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; N = 44,732). We examined self-reported CVD outcomes and related risk factors, as well as relevant serum biomarkers. Using instrumental variables (IV) analysis, we found that increased educational attainment was associated with reduced smoking (HRS β −0.036, 95%CI: −0.06, −0.02, p < 0.01; NHANES β −0.032, 95%CI: −0.05, −0.02, p < 0.01), depression (HRS β −0.049, 95% CI: −0.07, −0.03, p < 0.01), triglycerides (NHANES β −0.039, 95%CI: −0.06, −0.01, p < 0.01), and heart disease (HRS β −0.025, 95%CI: −0.04, −0.002, p = 0.01), and improvements in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (HRS β 1.50, 95%CI: 0.34, 2.49, p < 0.01; NHANES β 0.86, 95%CI: 0.32, 1.48, p < 0.01), but increased BMI (HRS β 0.20, 95% CI: 0.002, 0.40, p = 0.05; NHANES β 0.13, 95%CI: 0.01, 0.32, p = 0.05) and total cholesterol (HRS β 2.73, 95%CI: 0.09, 4.97, p = 0.03). While most findings were cross-validated across both data sets, they were not robust to the inclusion of state fixed effects. Limitations included residual confounding, use of self-reported outcomes for some analyses, and possibly limited generalizability to more recent cohorts. Conclusions This study provides rigorous population-level estimates of the association of educational attainment with CVD. These findings may guide future implementation of interventions to address the social determinants of CVD and strengthen the argument for including educational attainment in prediction algorithms and primary prevention guidelines for CVD.

References Powered by Scopus

The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population

46814Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments

5196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Psychological stress and disease

2353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021

801Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: BUILDING RESEARCH EQUITY FOR WOMEN AND UNDERREPRESENTED GROUPS

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine learning and algorithmic fairness in public and population health

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hamad, R., Nguyen, T. T., Bhattacharya, J., Glymour, M. M., & Rehkopf, D. H. (2019). Educational attainment and cardiovascular disease in the united states: A quasi-experimental instrumental variables analysis. PLoS Medicine, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002834

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

65%

Researcher 10

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

37%

Social Sciences 15

35%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

21%

Psychology 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 10
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 18

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free