Improving the accuracy of recombinant protein production through integration of bioinformatics, statistical and mass spectrometry methodologies

9Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Heterologous protein production is a key technology for biotechnological, health sciences and many other research fields. Various approaches have been developed for its optimization, but the research emphasis has been on optimization of protein yield rather than protein quality. In this study, we have established a workflow for synthetic gene optimization for heterologous protein expression that combines bioinformatics, laboratory experiments, mass spectrometry and statistical analysis. Two gene primary structure analysis platforms, Anaconda and EuGene, and multivariate optimization methods were employed to re-design the Plasmodium falciparum lysyl-tRNA synthetase gene for optimal expression in Escherichia coli. Synthetic genes were expressed from common vectors, and amino acid mis-incorporations in the expressed proteins were detected and quantified using mass spectrometry. The association between the identified amino acid mis-incorporations and 23 gene variables was then analysed. The synthetic genes yielded significantly higher levels of protein relative to the wild-type gene, but 71 amino acid mis-incorporation sites were observed along the whole protein and across the synthetic genes that were statistically associated with specific codons and protein secondary structures. The optimization method that led to production of the most accurate protein was based on a multivariate approach that combined variables that are known to influence mRNA translation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ragionieri, L., Vitorino, R., Frommlet, J., Oliveira, J. L., Gaspar, P., Ribas De Pouplana, L., … Moura, G. R. (2015). Improving the accuracy of recombinant protein production through integration of bioinformatics, statistical and mass spectrometry methodologies. FEBS Journal, 282(4), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.13181

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free