Safety and efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of idiopathic detrusor overactivity: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

36Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO). Methods: A total of 76 patients 18 years or older with IDO were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg tramadol sustained release (group 1, n = 38) or placebo (group 2, n = 38) every 12 h for 12 weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and every 2 weeks during treatment. All patients underwent urodynamics and ice water test at baseline and 12-week treatment. Main outcome measures were number of voids per 24 h, urine volume per void and episodes of urge incontinence per 24 h on a frequency volume chart and detailed recording of adverse effect. Results: After 12 weeks of treatment mean number of voids per 24 h ± SD decreased from 9.3 ± 3.2 to 5.1 ± 2.1 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.1 - 0.4]. At that time mean urine volume per void increased from 158 ± 32 to 198 ± 76 ml (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) (95% CI 8-22), while mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 h decreased from 3.2 ± 3.3 to 1.6 ± 2.8 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) (95% CI -2-0.3). Tramadol induced significant improvements in urodynamic parameters. More adverse effects were associated with tramadol treatment than with placebo (P < 0.05). The main adverse event with tramadol was nausea. Conclusions: In patients with non-neurogenic IDO tramadol provided beneficial clinical and urodynamic results. Further studies are required to draw final conclusions on the efficacy of this drug in IDO. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Safarinejad, M. R., & Hosseini, S. Y. (2006). Safety and efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of idiopathic detrusor overactivity: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 61(4), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02597.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free