Comparing survival in patients with chronic kidney disease across three countries – Results from the study of heart and renal protection-extended review

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: This study examined whether survival and causes of death differed between participants enrolled from Australia (AUS), Malaysia (MYL), and New Zealand (NZ) in extended follow-up of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP), a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of participants with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease comparing placebo to combination therapy with Simvastatin and Ezetimibe. Methods: All participants alive at final SHARP study visit in participating centres were eligible for inclusion. Consenting participants were re-enrolled following final SHARP Study visit and followed for 5 years. Data collection included: significant medical events, hospital admissions and requirement for kidney replacement therapy. Data linkage was performed to national kidney and mortality registries. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality compared across the three countries. Results: The SHARP trial randomized 2029 participants from AUS (1043/2029, 51%), MYL (701/2029, 35%), and NZ (285/2029, 14%), with 1136 participants alive and eligible for extended follow-up at the end of SHARP. In multivariable analysis, risk of death was increased for participants in MYL (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.17–1.61, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Talbot, B., Cass, A., Walker, R., Hooi, L., Jardine, M., Jun, M., … Gallagher, M. (2023). Comparing survival in patients with chronic kidney disease across three countries – Results from the study of heart and renal protection-extended review. Nephrology, 28(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.14127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free