Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for Sepsis secondary to pneumonia diagnosed via Sepsis 3.0

39Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sepsis biomarkers have limited specificity and sensitivity. Few studies have investigated microRNA (miRNA) biomarkers for sepsis secondary to pneumonia. This study aims to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic values of miRNAs in sepsis secondary to pneumonia. Methods: Sepsis 3.0 was used to diagnose sepsis. Screening was performed through the Agilent miRNA chip technology by using the following criteria: p < 0.05, fold ≥2 or < 0.5, or copy number > 50 change. This study recruited 52 patients with pneumonia, including 31 males (59.6%) and 21 females (40.4%), 44 patients with sepsis secondary to pneumonia were diagnosed via Sepsis 3.0 (34 [77.3%] males and 10 [22.7%] females), and 21 healthy controls were used for miRNA verification. The miRNA levels were detected through fluorescence real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: Fluorescence qRT-PCR detection showed that the miR-7110-5p and miR-223-3p expression levels in both patient groups were upregulated compared with those in the healthy controls. The expression levels differed between patients with pneumonia and those with sepsis secondary to pneumonia. The sensitivity and specificity of miR-7110-5p to differentiate sepsis from healthy controls were 84.2 and 90.5%, whereas those of miR-223-3p were 82.9 and 100%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of variance suggested that the presence of sepsis affected the miR-223-3p level (p = 0.041), whereas the presence of sepsis (p = 0.000) and the underlying disease (p = 0.025) influenced the miR-7110-5p level. Conclusions: MiR-223-3p could be utilized to predict sepsis secondary to pneumonia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, W., Jia, J., Liu, Z., Si, D., Ma, L., & Zhang, G. (2019). Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for Sepsis secondary to pneumonia diagnosed via Sepsis 3.0. BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0836-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free