Security-by-ontology: A knowledge-centric approach

5Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a security ontology (SO), which can be used as a basis of security management of an arbitrary information system. This SO provides capabilities, such as modeling of risk assessment knowledge, abstraction of security requirements, reusable security knowledge interoperability, aggregation and reasoning. The SO is based on the exploitation of security-related knowledge, derived from diverse sources. We demonstrate that the establishment of such a framework is feasible and, furthermore, that a SO can support critical security activities of an expert, e.g. security requirements identification, as well as selection of certain countermeasures. We also present and discuss an implementation of a specific SO. The implementation is accompanied by results regarding how a SO can be built and populated with security information. © 2006 International Federation for Information Processing.

References Powered by Scopus

The ponder policy specification language

666Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SOUPA: Standard ontology for ubiquitous and pervasive applications

468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A policy language for a pervasive computing environment

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A systematic review of security requirements engineering

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Basis for an integrated security ontology according to a systematic review of existing proposals

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fundamentals of secure system modelling

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsoumas, B., Papagiannakopoulos, P., Dritsas, S., & Gritzalis, D. (2006). Security-by-ontology: A knowledge-centric approach. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 201, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33406-8_9

Readers over time

‘09‘13‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

19%

Researcher 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

82%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0