Forest restoration and fuels reduction: Convergent or divergent?

78Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For over 20 years, forest fuel reduction has been the dominant management action in western US forests. These same actions have also been associated with the restoration of highly altered frequent-fire forests. Perhaps the vital element in the compatibility of these treatments is that both need to incorporate the salient characteristics that frequent fire produced-variability in vegetation structure and composition across landscapes and the inability to support large patches of high-severity fire. These characteristics can be achieved with both fire and mechanical treatments. The possible key to convergence of fuel reduction and forest restoration strategies is integrated planning that permits treatment design flexibility and a longer-Term focus on fire reintroduction for maintenance. With changing climate conditions, long-Term forest conservation will probably need to be focused on keeping tree density low enough (i.e., in the lower range of historic variation) for forest conditions to adapt to emerging disturbance patterns and novel ecological processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stephens, S. L., Battaglia, M. A., Churchill, D. J., Collins, B. M., Coppoletta, M., Hoffman, C. M., … Stevens, J. T. (2021, January 1). Forest restoration and fuels reduction: Convergent or divergent? BioScience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free