Impact of Patient Navigation on Population-Based Breast Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

3Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Unsatisfactory cancer screening results are often associated with poor prognosis. This study synthesized the literatures addressing the impact of patient navigation (PN) interventions on population-based breast cancer screening promotion to identify characteristics of the model for addressing breast cancer disparities. Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Registry from inception to 31 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials (PROSPERO: CRD42021246890). We double blindly abstracted data and assessed study quality. We assessed screening completion rates and diagnostic resolution using random-effects models between those receiving navigation and controls. Results: Of 236 abstracts identified, 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Nine of the papers evaluated the impact of PN on breast screening, while the other six were on the resolution of abnormal screening results. Compared to the non-PN group, PN improved screening completion (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4–2.8]) and shortened the time to diagnosis (WMD: − 9.90 days, 95% CI: − 19.09 to − 0.71). Conclusions: Patient navigation improves breast cancer screening rates but does not improve resolution of abnormal tests.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tian, L., Huang, L., Liu, J., Li, X., Ajmal, A., Ajmal, M., … Tian, L. (2022, August 1). Impact of Patient Navigation on Population-Based Breast Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07641-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

33%

Computer Science 2

17%

Social Sciences 2

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free