Avaliação do viés de participação em estudos de coorte: Uma revisão sistemática e metarregressão

20Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proportion of non-participation in cohort studies, if associated with both the exposure and the probability of occurrence of the event, can introduce bias in the estimates of interest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of participation and its characteristics in longitudinal studies. A systematic review (MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science) for articles describing the proportion of participation in the baseline of cohort studies was performed. Among the 2,964 initially identified, 50 were selected. The average proportion of participation was 64.7%. Using a meta-regression model with mixed effects, only age, year of baseline contact and study region (borderline) were associated with participation. Considering the decrease in participation in recent years, and the cost of cohort studies, it is essential to gather information to assess the potential for non-participation, before committing resources. Finally, journals should require the presentation of this information in the papers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva Junior, S. H. A. da, Santos, S. M., Coeli, C. M., & Carvalho, M. S. (2015, November 1). Avaliação do viés de participação em estudos de coorte: Uma revisão sistemática e metarregressão. Cadernos de Saude Publica. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00133814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free