Economic analysis of the costs of flooding

14Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The pecuniary and non-pecuniary social costs of flooding are analyzed, and are illustrated with results from a simple macroeconomic model calibrated to have damage and other characteristics similar to those observed in recent Canadian flooding. Pecuniary costs include relief and cleanup, capital damage and net output loss. Net output loss tends to rise in relative importance with the length of recovery and, as a result, also increases with capital damage if it causes recovery to take longer. Capital damage is larger than output loss here, as in previous studies. Distributional and insurance aspects are also examined. Reliance on federal disaster assistance creates moral hazard both for individuals and lower levels of government. Wider private insurance coverage and the introduction of a significant premium for public flood insurance are recommended.

References Powered by Scopus

The economics of climate change: The stern review

7022Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the measurement of inequality

3296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Future flood losses in major coastal cities

1711Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How Flood Experience and Risk Perception Influences Protective Actions and Behaviours among Canadian Homeowners

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Developing a comprehensive methodology for evaluating economic impacts of floods in Canada, Mexico and the United States

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Paradoxes of financial schemes for resilient flood recovery of households

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davies, J. B. (2016). Economic analysis of the costs of flooding. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 41(1–2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2015.1055804

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

75%

Researcher 3

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 10

48%

Social Sciences 4

19%

Engineering 4

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free