Possible Worlds

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recall that the first order modal logic institution MFOL, introduced as an example in Sect. 3.2, refines FOL by adding the modalities of ‘necessity’ and ‘possibility’. While at the sentence level this means a couple of additional unary connectives (□ for ‘necessity” and ⋄ for ‘possibility’), their semantics is much less straightforward because it requires the concept of ‘possible worlds’ semantics, which means that the models are Kripke models, i.e., collections of possible interpretations rather than single interpretation of the signatures. Possible worlds semantics even subtly ‘alters’ the standard semantics of the Boolean connectives and of the quantifiers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Possible Worlds. (2008). In Studies in Universal Logic (Vol. Part F1856, pp. 235–251). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8708-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free