A pretest–posttest pilot study for the development and preliminary validation of a tool for the clinical assessment of radioiodine induced sialadenitis

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical assessment of radioiodine-induced sialadenitis is relied on the observer-defined toxicity grading model. However, this model has significant limitations, the major one being the lack of systematic assessment based on objective criteria. The main aim of this study was the development and testing of an assessment tool which could examine the severity of post-irradiation sialadenitis. Methods: The development of the Sialadenitis Assessment Tool proceeded through three phases. The first and second phases included a literature review and the development of the tool which derived from the review, respectively. The third phase involved a pilot testing of the Assessment Tool to a sample of 34 patients undergoing I131 therapy. The assessment was carried out by two independent healthcare professionals, pre- and post-radioiodine therapy. The results of the assessment tool were compared with other scales, including the DIRIX and EORTC H&N35. Results: According to the Cohen’s kappa test, the Sialadenitis Assessment Tool is a reliable tool for the assessment of sialadenitis (Cohen’s κ = 1). The concurrent and internal validity tests showed a tendency of association with most variables (p < 0.001) in the DIRIX and EORTC QLQ-HN35 scales. Conclusion: Preliminary evidence show that Sialadenitis Assessment Tool is a valid and reliable tool to assess radioiodine-induced sialadenitis in patients undergoing I131 therapy post-thyroidectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christou, A., Papastavrou, E., Merkouris, A., & Charalambous, A. (2021). A pretest–posttest pilot study for the development and preliminary validation of a tool for the clinical assessment of radioiodine induced sialadenitis. SAGE Open Medicine, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211042211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free