Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: A modified Delphi study

155Citations
Citations of this article
272Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and objectives: To generate a standardised definition for fundamental care and identify the discrete elements that constitute such care. Background: There is poor conceptual clarity surrounding fundamental care. The Fundamentals of Care Framework aims to overcome this problem by outlining three core dimensions underpinning such care. Implementing the Framework requires a standardised definition for fundamental care that reflects the Framework's conceptual understanding, as well as agreement on the elements that comprise such care (i.e., patient needs, such as nutrition, and nurse actions, such as empathy). This study sought to achieve this consensus. Design: Modified Delphi study. Methods: Three phases: (i) engaging stakeholders via an interactive workshop; (ii) using workshop findings to develop a preliminary definition for, and identify the discrete elements that constitute, fundamental care; and (iii) gaining consensus on the definition and elements via a two-round Delphi approach (Round 1 n = 38; Round 2 n = 28). Results: Delphi participants perceived both the definition and elements generated from the workshop as comprehensive, but beyond the scope of fundamental care. Participants questioned whether the definition should focus on patient needs and nurse actions, or more broadly on how fundamental care should be delivered (e.g., through a trusting nurse–patient relationship), and the outcomes of this care delivery. There were also mixed opinions whether the definition should be nursing specific. Conclusions: This study has initiated crucial dialogue around how fundamental care is conceptualised and defined. Future work should focus on further refinements of the definition and elements with a larger, international group of practising nurses and service users. Relevance to clinical practice: The definition and elements, through ongoing refinement, will contribute to a robust evidence base that will underpin policy development and the systematic and effective teaching, delivery, measurement and evaluation of fundamental care.

References Powered by Scopus

The qualitative content analysis process

14168Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine

1526Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The values and value of patient-centered care

1254Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Registered nurses’ perspectives of work satisfaction, patient safety and intention to stay – A double-edged sword

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of an internationally accepted definition of reablement: A Delphi study

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feo, R., Conroy, T., Jangland, E., Muntlin Athlin, Å., Brovall, M., Parr, J., … Kitson, A. (2018). Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(11–12), 2285–2299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14247

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 71

63%

Researcher 17

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 91

76%

Medicine and Dentistry 19

16%

Social Sciences 5

4%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free