The attentional blink (AB) effect demonstrates that when participants are instructed to report two targets presented in a rapid visual stimuli stream, the second target (T2) is often unable to be reported correctly if presented 200-500 msec after the onset of the first target (T1). However, if T2 is presented immediately after T1, in the conventional lag-1 position (100-msec stimulus onset asynchrony; SOA), little or no performance deficit occurs. The present experiments add to the growing literature relating the "lag-1 sparing" effect to Tl masking. Using a canonical AB paradigm, our results demonstrate that T2 performance at lag 1 is significantly reduced in the presence of T1 masking. The implications of this outcome are discussed in relation to theories of the AB. Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Martin, E. W., & Shapiro, K. L. (2008). Does failure to mask T1 cause lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink? Perception and Psychophysics, 70(3), 562–570. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.562
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.