Neither the Global North nor the Global South: locating the post-Soviet space in/out of the Women, Peace and Security agenda

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite 20 years of theorization on the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda, a critical review of the WPS literature points to a large, curious, and ignored epistemic gap regarding the post-Soviet space. In this exploratory article, I want to problematize this absence. While the gap can be partly attributed to the Anglophone hegemony in this literature, I suggest an alternative explanation: metageography and the “in-betweenness” of the post-Soviet region as an ambiguous space corresponding to neither the Global North nor the Global South. Drawing on insights from post-socialist feminist theories about the former “Second World,” I argue that the post-Soviet space has been erased from the WPS literature because–as elsewhere in the social sciences–the end of the Cold War rearranged the East/West geopolitical imaginaries into a Global North/Global South divide. Consequently, this epistemic gap creates an incomplete picture of the WPS agenda as a whole. I urge and challenge WPS scholars to pay attention to this region by developing the outline of a more holistic research agenda beyond the Global North/Global South binary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santoire, B. (2023). Neither the Global North nor the Global South: locating the post-Soviet space in/out of the Women, Peace and Security agenda. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 25(5), 819–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2023.2195412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free