Cognitive-constructivism, quine, dogmas of empiricism, and münchhausen’s Trilemma

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Bayesian research group at University of São Paulo has been exploring a specific version of cognitive constructivism (Cog-Con) that has, among its most salient features, a distinctive objective character. Cog-Con is supported by a specially designed measure of statistical significance, namely, ev(H |X)—the Bayesian epistemic value of sharp hypotheses H, given the observed data X. This article explores possible parallels or contrasts between Cog-Con and the epistemological framework developed by the philosopherWillard van Orman Quine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stern, J. M. (2015). Cognitive-constructivism, quine, dogmas of empiricism, and münchhausen’s Trilemma. In Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics (Vol. 118, pp. 55–68). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12454-4_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free