Personal risk taking and the spread of disease: Beyond core groups

66Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Disease control efforts directed at human immunodeficiency virus are predicated on the need to reduce personal risk behaviors; that approach may not adequately reflect the complicated interplay between personal behaviors and the social setting in which they occur. Efforts to date, including the application of population ecology, the development of the core group hypothesis, and the use of compartment models to describe disease transmission, have aided in understanding the dynamics of transmission and have highlighted the relationship between personal risk taking and population risk. An area for further development is the application of the techniques of social network analysis to infectious disease spread. Initial work suggests that social structure may act as a barrier (or facilitator) in disease transmission and that the epidemiologic impact of a risky act varies with the social setting. The local context for risk behaviors has important implications for the dynamics of transmission.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups

726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks

548Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: A network explanation

502Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rothenberg, R. B., Potterat, J. J., & Woodhouse, D. E. (1996). Personal risk taking and the spread of disease: Beyond core groups. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 174(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/174.supplement_2.s144

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

51%

Researcher 12

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

46%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

26%

Social Sciences 8

23%

Computer Science 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free