Multiple known algorithmic paradigms (backtracking, local search and the polynomial method) only yield a 2n(1−1/O(k)) time algorithm for k-SAT in the worst case. For this reason, it has been hypothesized that the worst-case k-SAT problem cannot be solved in 2n(1−f(k)/k) time for any unbounded function f. This hypothesis has been called the “Super-Strong ETH”, modeled after the ETH and the Strong ETH. We give two results on the Super-Strong ETH: 1.It has also been hypothesized that k-SAT is hard to solve for randomly chosen instances near the “critical threshold”, where the clause-to-variable ratio is 2k ln 2−Θ(1). We give a randomized algorithm which refutes the Super-Strong ETH for the case of random k-SAT and planted k-SAT for any clause-to-variable ratio. For example, given any random k-SAT instance F with n variables and m clauses, our algorithm decides satisfiability for F in n time, with high probability (over the choice of the formula and the randomness of the algorithm). It turns out that a well-known algorithm from the literature on SAT algorithms does the job: the PPZ algorithm of Paturi, Pudlák and Zane [17].2.The Unique k-SAT problem is the special case where there is at most one satisfying assignment. Improving prior reductions, we show that the Super-Strong ETHs for Unique k-SAT and k-SAT are equivalent. More precisely, we show the time complexities of Unique k-SAT and k-SAT are very tightly correlated: if Unique k-SAT is in 2n(1−f(k)/k) time for an unbounded f, then k-SAT is in 2n(1−f(k)(1−ε)/k) time for every ε > 0.
CITATION STYLE
Vyas, N., & Williams, R. (2019). On Super Strong ETH. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11628 LNCS, pp. 406–423). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24258-9_28
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.