2526

  • Christine Kugler K
  • Tanner A
  • Wyrick D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The goal of this study is to develop an effective and efficient STI preventive intervention among college students following the principles and phases of MOST. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION As part of the preparation phase, an explicit conceptual model, drawing heavily on theory and prior research, was used to translate the existing science into 5 candidate intervention components (ie, descriptive norms, injunctive norms, expectancies, perceived benefits of protective behavioral strategies, and self-efficacy). For the optimization phase, in Fall 2016 all first-year students (n=3547) from 4 universities were recruited to participate. Students were randomized to 1 of 32 different experimental conditions that included a combination of the candidate intervention components. Component effectiveness was evaluated using data from an immediate post-intervention survey on respective component mediators (eg, alcohol and sex-related descriptive norms). After a second factorial experiment (Fall 2017), only those intervention components that meet the pre-specified criteria of day ≥0.15 will be included in the optimized intervention. The evaluation phase will evaluate the effectiveness of the optimized STI preventive intervention via a randomized-control trial (Fall 2018). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary results from the first factorial experiment suggest that descriptive norms and injunctive norms intervention components were significantly effective in reducing post-intervention perceived alcohol prevalence (β=−0.28, p <0.001) and approval of alcohol (β=−0.33, p <0.001), and sex-related norms (β=−0.23, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christine Kugler, K., Tanner, A. E., Wyrick, D. L., Milroy, J. J., Chambers, B. D., Ma, A., & Collins, L. M. (2017). 2526. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(S1), 82–82. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.289

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free