Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment

90Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Holstein and Jersey cows were mated to 4 Holstein (H) bulls and 4 Jersey (J) bulls to create HH, HJ, JH, and JJ genetic groups (sire breed listed first) in a diallele crossbreeding scheme. Calvings (n = 756) occurred in research herds in Virginia, Kentucky, and North Carolina with 243, 166, 194, and 153 calvings in the HH, HJ, JH, and JJ groups, respectively. Birth weights (BW), dystocia scores (0 for unassisted and 1 for assisted), and stillbirth (0 for alive or 1 for dead within 48 h) were recorded at calving. Gestation lengths (GL) were determined from breeding dates. An animal model was used to analyze BW and GL, and an animal model with logistic regression was used for dystocia and still-birth. Fixed effects considered for model inclusion were genetic group, herd-year-season, sex, parity (primiparous or multiparous), twin status, and gestation length. Genetic group and effects significant in the model building process were kept in the final model for each trait. Heifer calves had lower BW, shorter GL, and had a lower odds ratio (0.53) for dystocia than bull calves. Twins had lower BW, shorter GL, were 3.86 times more likely to experience dystocia, and 7.80 times more likely to be stillborn than single births. Primiparous cows had calves with lower BW, shorter GL, were 2.50 times more likely to require assistance at birth, and were 2.35 times more likely to produce stillborns than calves from multiparous cows. Genetic group did not affect GL. Least squares means (kg) for BW were 37.7 ± 1.1, 29.1 ± 1.1, 30.3 ± 1.0, and 22.5 ± 1.3 for HH, HJ, JH, and JJ, respectively. Animals in HH weighed more than animals of other genetic groups; the JJ group had the smallest BW, with no differences for BW between HJ and JH. Probability of dystocia in JJ and JH were 5.73% and 18.98% of HH. Calves in HJ and HH were not different for dystocia. Calves in HJ were 3.38 times more likely to be stillborn than calves in JH, but no other genetic group differences were significant for probability of stillbirth. Groups HJ and JH differed for calving traits, with JH crosses experiencing less dystocia than HJ; JJ showed no indication of dystocia. No differences were observed between HH and JJ for stillbirths. Additional investigation of stillbirths in Jerseys is justified. © American Dairy Science Association, 2009.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle

308Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility

234Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimates of genetic parameters for Canadian Holstein female reproduction traits

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Calf birth weight, gestation length, calving ease, and neonatal calf mortality in Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows in a pasture system

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamics of the microbiota found in the vaginas of dairy cows during the transition period: Associations with uterine diseases and reproductive outcome

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management practices for male calves on Canadian dairy farms

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olson, K. M., Cassell, B. G., McAllister, A. J., & Washburn, S. P. (2009). Dystocia, stillbirth, gestation length, and birth weight in Holstein, Jersey, and reciprocal crosses from a planned experiment. Journal of Dairy Science, 92(12), 6167–6175. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2260

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

69%

Researcher 10

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39

61%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 19

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

6%

Engineering 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free