Normospermic Versus Teratospermic Domestic Cat Sperm Chromatin Integrity Evaluated by Flow Cytometry and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection

38Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Teratospermia (>60% of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa) is well documented in felids. Even morphologically normal spermatozoa from teratospermic ejaculates have reduced ability to undergo tyrosine phosphorylation, acrosome react, and bind and penetrate oocytes compared with normospermic (<40% abnormal spermatozoa) counterparts. However, it is unknown whether fertilization deficiencies originate at a nuclear level. This study examined whether fertilization failure also was attributable to abnormal sperm chromatin, using the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Aliquots of unprocessed and swim-up-processed (to isolate morphologically normal spermatozoa) spermatozoa from teratospermic and normospermic domestic cats were analyzed by the flow cytometric SCSA. Swim-up-processed sperm were incubated with in vivo-matured oocytes or used for ICSI. Teratospermic ejaculates expressed more (P < 0.05) chromatin heterogeneity (abnormal chromatin structure) than their normospermic counterparts, both in unprocessed and swim-up-processed samples. Fertilization success in vitro was higher (P < 0.05) from normo- compared with teratospermic inseminates. Similar (P > 0.05) proportions of oocytes fertilized after ICSI using spermatozoa from normo- and teratospermic cats. Results reveal that teratospermia in the cat is expressed at the nuclear level as increased sperm chromatin heterogeneity, but ICSI showed that this does not apparently affect fertilization rates if the zona pellucida and oolemma can be bypassed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penfold, L. M., Jost, L., Evenson, D. P., & Wildt, D. E. (2003). Normospermic Versus Teratospermic Domestic Cat Sperm Chromatin Integrity Evaluated by Flow Cytometry and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection. Biology of Reproduction, 69(5), 1730–1735. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.016089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free