Software Architecture Proposal for Navigation and Decisions of Autonomous Ground Vehicles in Controlled Environments with Unavoidable Collision Scenarios

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years the ethic of autonomous vehicles has become one of the main topics of discussion in the field of autonomous driving. In this paper, an approach for the problem of the ethics of autonomous vehicles and a proposal solution are presented. In order to address this issue, software architecture is proposed. This architecture will be in charge of the navigation of the vehicle and obstacle avoidance, furthermore, it will provide the necessary information to make decisions in case of unavoidable collisions. Using a fuzzy logic implementation, the objective is to generate a set of outputs that allow a secondary system to take decisions in a case of an unavoidable collision. The results obtained were validated using statistical data. As a whole, the system shows a competent ability to determine the situation and generate the outputs.

References Powered by Scopus

The Moral Machine experiment

1116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Incorporating Ethical Considerations into Automated Vehicle Control

77Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Automatic brake Driver Assistance System based on deep learning and fuzzy logic

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valdes-Saucedo, M. A., Fuentes-Aguilar, R. Q., Carbajal-Espinosa, O., & Vazquez, C. R. (2022). Software Architecture Proposal for Navigation and Decisions of Autonomous Ground Vehicles in Controlled Environments with Unavoidable Collision Scenarios. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 347 LNNS, pp. 270–278). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90033-5_29

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

50%

Energy 1

25%

Computer Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free