Causal propagation semantics—a study

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A unifying semantic framework for different reasoning approaches provides an ideal tool to compare these competing alternatives. A historic example is Kripke’s possible world semantics that provided a unifying framework for different systems of modal logic. More recently, Shoham’s work on preferential semantics similarly provided a much needed framework to uniformly represent and compare a variety of nonmonotonic logics (including some logics of action). The present work develops a novel type of semantics for a particuleir causal approach to reasoning about action. The basic idea is to abandon the standard statespace of possible worlds and consider instead a larger set of possibiUties—a hyper-space—tracing the effects of auctions (including indirect effects) with the states in the hyper-space. Intuitively, the purpose of these hyper-states is to supply extra context to record the process of causality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prokopenko, M., Pagnucco, M., Peppas, P., & Nayak, A. (1999). Causal propagation semantics—a study. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1747, pp. 378–392). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46695-9_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free