Determining environmental costs: A challenge in a governmental e-waste recycling scheme

12Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) concept involves having producers take environmental responsibility for post-consumer products. Based on this principle, theWaste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive of the European Union, enacted in 2006, is the most representative management program in the world and the most popular recycling policy many countries follow. Taiwan's version of EPR for WEEE recycling, set up in 1998, had a focus on recycling fees determined by a recycling fee equation. Nowadays, the equation takes into account the consideration of the environment in the designs of products, in addition to the cost needed for recycling. The environmental performance upgrades in products, encouraged by the financial incentives from these considerations, is a side-benefit of this program. In this paper, the functions of the recycling fee equation that consider environmental costs are reviewed. It was found that in spite of the difficulty in determining the real environmental costs in practice, pricing is a mechanism which helps us to consider the cost of e-waste recycling, not only in terms of labor and administration, but also environmental quality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, C. P., Lin, C. H., Wen, L. C., & Chang, T. C. (2019). Determining environmental costs: A challenge in a governmental e-waste recycling scheme. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free