Bell’s Theorem and the Issue of Determinism and Indeterminism

8Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper considers the claim that quantum theories with a deterministic dynamics of objects in ordinary space-time, such as Bohmian mechanics, contradict the assumption that the measurement settings can be freely chosen in the EPR experiment. That assumption is one of the premises of Bell’s theorem. I first argue that only a premise to the effect that what determines the choice of the measurement settings is independent of what determines the past state of the measured system is needed for the derivation of Bell’s theorem. Determinism as such does not undermine that independence (unless there are particular initial conditions of the universe that would amount to conspiracy). Only entanglement could do so. However, generic entanglement without collapse on the level of the universal wave-function can go together with effective wave-functions for subsystems of the universe, as in Bohmian mechanics. The paper argues that such effective wave-functions are sufficient for the mentioned independence premise to hold.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esfeld, M. (2015). Bell’s Theorem and the Issue of Determinism and Indeterminism. Foundations of Physics, 45(5), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9883-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free