Theory and extensive evidence connect poverty and underdevelopment to civil conflict yet evidence on the impact of development programs on violence is surprisingly mixed. To break this impasse, we exploit a within-country policy experiment to examine the conditions under which antipoverty programs reduce violence. The roll-out of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme caused a large long-run reduction in Maoist conflict violence, as measured with an original data set based on local-language press sources. These pacifying effects were not uniform, however, but overwhelmingly concentrated in districts with sufficient pre-existing local state capacity to implement the program effectively. The results demonstrate the potential for anti-poverty programs to mitigate violent civil conflict by improving livelihoods, but also highlight the crucial role of state capacity in shaping these effects.
CITATION STYLE
Dasgupta, A., Gawande, K., & Kapur, D. (2017). (When) do antipoverty programs reduce violence? India’s rural employment Guarantee and Maoist conflict. International Organization, 71(3), 605–632. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000236
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.