Resolving inconsistencies in evolving ontologies

34Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Changing a consistent ontology may turn the ontology into an inconsistent state. It is the task of an approach supporting ontology evolution to ensure an ontology evolves from one consistent state into another consistent state. In this paper, we focus on checking consistency of OWL DL ontologies. While existing reasoners allow detecting inconsistencies, determining why the ontology is inconsistent and offering solutions for these inconsistencies is far from trivial. We therefore propose an algorithm to select the axioms from an ontology causing the inconsistency, as well as a set of rules that ontology engineers can use to resolve the detected inconsistency. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

A survey of schema versioning issues for database systems

192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The FaCT system

162Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ontology change: Classification and survey

232Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding ontology evolution: A change detection approach

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ORE - A tool for repairing and enriching knowledge bases

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plessers, P., & De Troyer, O. (2006). Resolving inconsistencies in evolving ontologies. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4011 LNCS, pp. 200–214). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_17

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

69%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 23

88%

Physics and Astronomy 1

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

4%

Mathematics 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free