Innovative contracting for pharmaceuticals and medicaid's best-price rule

18Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, drug manufacturers and private payers have expressed interest in novel pricing models that more closely link a drug's price to its value. Indication-based pricing, outcome-based pricing, drug licenses, and drug mortgages have all been discussed as alternatives to paying strictly for volume. Manufacturers and payers have complained, however, that Medicaid's "best-price rule" inhibits their ability to enter into these newpricing arrangements. This article examines the best-price rule and assesses to what extent, if any, it might frustrate the goal of paying for value.We conclude that the best-price rule is not as serious a problem as it is sometimes made out to be but that it is also not simply a convenient excuse for refusing to try something new. The law here is complex, and moving to a pay-for-value model for drugs will require close coordination among manufacturers, payers, and regulators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sachs, R., Bagley, N., & Lakdawalla, D. N. (2018). Innovative contracting for pharmaceuticals and medicaid’s best-price rule. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-4249796

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free