Incidence, clinical relevance and therapeutic options for outflow graft stenosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed our institutional experience with outflow graft stenosis (OGS) in 3 contemporary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). METHODS: Data from 347 consecutive adult recipients of LVAD [Medtronic HVAD (n = 184, 53.0%), Abbott HeartMate II (n = 62, 17.9%) and Abbott HeartMate 3 (n = 101, 29.1%)] implanted between March 2006 and October 2019 were analysed retrospectively. Primary study end points were the incidence of OGS necessitating treatment and survival on LVAD support. RESULTS: During the study period, 17 patients (4.9%) developed OGS requiring treatment with a probability of 0.6% at 1 year, 1.9% at 2 years, 3.8% at 3 years, 4.7% at 4 years and 5.9% at 5 years of LVAD support. Notably, in 13.8% of patients, a compression-related narrowing of the outflow graft with a probability of 1.5% at 6 months, 1.8% 1 year, 6.0% at 2 years, 12.3% at 3 years, 15.4% at 4 years and 16.6% at 5 years of LVAD support with no difference between devices (P = 0.26) was observed. There was a trend towards increased risk of mortality with OGS (hazard ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 0.87-5.51; P = 0.09). OGS preferentially occurred in segments of the outflow graft covered by a protective coating. CONCLUSIONS: OGS is a rare but potentially lethal complication during LVAD support. Modifications of pump design and implant techniques may be needed because OGS preferentially occurs within covered portions of the outflow graft. Systematic screening may be warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dimitrov, K., Kaider, A., Angleitner, P., Schlöglhofer, T., Gross, C., Beitzke, D., … Zimpfer, D. (2022). Incidence, clinical relevance and therapeutic options for outflow graft stenosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 61(3), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab382

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free